This post was originally published on ZPE Systems
In a top-of-rack data center architecture, DC teams install one or more switches in every rack of their deployment; despite the name, the switch doesn’t need to actually be at the very top of the rack. A ToR deployment keeps copper/Ethernet patch cables inside the rack, which helps with cable management. It also eliminates the single-point-of-failure that an EoR switch represents – if one ToR switch goes down for some reason, only the devices within that rack are affected, vs. the entire row. Another major benefit of EoR deployments is that each rack becomes a modular unit that DC teams can modify, upgrade, or scale without necessarily affecting other racks in the row.
On the other hand, a ToR deployment requires more switches than an EoR deployment, which can increase costs and complexity. More switches equate to more power draw, and they add an extra network hop to local traffic that could possibly affect throughput. Each switch must also be monitored, secured, and regularly patched, potentially creating more work for infrastructure teams. As a result, ToR deployments are also more challenging to scale, as each new rack added to the data center requires an additional ToR switch.
Comparing end-of-row vs top-of-rack
— Read the rest of this post, which was originally published on ZPE Systems.
